How the industry works
-
1The input
Procurement and the state subsidy
Unlike almost any other agricultural business, a Saudi miller carries no crop risk and buys nothing on a commodity market. The General Food Security Authority buys the wheat, internationally or from local farmers, holds it, and then allocates and sells it to the four licensed millers at one flat subsidized rate, SAR 180 a ton under the pricing policy in force. The quantity is an allocation rather than a sale won, and the price is a policy rather than a negotiation.
Million tons allocated to the four millers. Sourced rather than model output, and on a different basis from the tonnage the companies report milling.GFSA allocationSubsidized wheatWheat on the ground, at a price nobody here negotiated. Nothing has been milled.
-
2The capacity
Storage and core milling operations
The allocated wheat arrives at regional facilities and goes into silos, which buffer an allocation that arrives in shipments against a mill that runs every day. The silos are licensed along with the mill, and what a miller holds is working storage rather than a national reserve: the strategic stock stays with the state, which keeps several times the four companies' combined capacity. First Mills holds the most of it and is the only one of the four to have added any. The other three carry the figure they carried in 2018, and Fourth Mills, holding the least, is not the shortest of cover.
Silo storage, FY2025Bars to the largest silo here. Storage has no natural ceiling; days of cover does the comparing.
SilosRoller millsThe wheat is under cover and the mills are turning. What comes out of them has not been separated yet.
-
3The product mix
Bifurcation into flour and feed
Milling does not convert wheat, it separates it. One input leaves as two commercially unrelated streams: flour, graded by refinement into patent, bakery, whole wheat and specialty grades, and bran, the outer hull of the grain. The ratio between them is a product specification rather than a decision, which is why Modern Mills and Arabian Mills split the ton to the same point and First Mills lands a few points below both, disclosing less flour and bran than its wheat capacity implies. Fourth Mills does not disclose the split at all.
One ton, separated, FY2025FlourBranShare of daily wheat capacity. The percentage is the flour half, the priced one.
This is the core margin driver of the sector, because the two halves are priced by different people: basic flour is capped to protect food security, and the feed is sold at market rates. So the only real choice at this stage is how much of the ton a company has built the capacity to push into feed, and it is the one place in the core operation where the four visibly diverge. Modern Mills has committed the most of its throughput to it and First Mills is close behind, while Arabian Mills has built under half of that, the smallest feed line of the four, and Fourth Mills sits at much the same level.
Feed line, share of wheat capacity, FY2025Bran milled again into feed and sold at market rates. This is the choice, and it is the one place the four separate.
Flour extractionBran and feedTwo products, two markets, and only one of them has its price set for it.
-
4The pricing power
Brands and the value-add
Because bulk regulated flour is priced for them, margin expansion has to be bought somewhere else, and that somewhere is the pack. Output divides into bulk sizes for industrial bakeries and corporate clients, and premium retail packs for households. The first is the volume and carries the administered price; the second sits outside the scheme entirely and is priced by whoever makes it, which is the closest thing to pricing power any of these companies has. Arabian Mills leans on it hardest of the four and First Mills least.
Sales by channel, FY2025B2B bulkB2C retailApproximate, and a share of each company's own sales rather than of the four.
That is also why the consumer brand matters here in a way it would not in a commodity manufacturer. Valuation growth comes from non-subsidized, higher-margin lines carrying a name: pasta, gluten-free products, pre-made bakery mixes and specialized animal nutrition. All four have built at least one. First Mills and Arabian Mills have built a second, which is the split worth reading in the table: a corporate name for the bulk trade, and a separate one for the shelf, where the price is theirs to set. It is also the only asset anywhere in this sequence that the state has no view on at all.
Consumer brandsCompany Key commercial brands First Mills First Mills, Aloula Arabian Mills Finah, Kamil Modern Mills Modern Mills Fourth Mills MC4 Two of the four run a second brand to carry the premium end away from the corporate one.
B2B bulkB2C retailA branded pack, priced by whoever makes it. It still has to reach a shelf.
-
5The live market
Last-mile logistics and distribution
Only at the final stage does any of it become money. Finished product goes out on large freight fleets to hypermarkets, bakeries, hotels, restaurants and catering clients across the Kingdom, and it cannot leave: exporting is prohibited unless the company repays the subsidy on that batch of wheat. Growth is therefore domestic share, and on the one measure the disclosures support, First Mills, Modern Mills and Arabian Mills land within a tenth of one another, and Fourth Mills does not report it at all. Nobody here has share power either, only volume.
Tons milled, FY2025Bars to the largest reported. Not shares: one company does not report the figure, and a share would have given its tons to the other three.
Freight fleetHORECA and retailFlour sold and paid for almost at once. The only door out of the Kingdom has a toll on it.
How they make money
Every bar below is that company’s share of everything the four sell through that door. Read down a door and the bars add to a whole; read across a company and they do not, because the doors are different sizes.
-
Where the volume is
Regulated flour
The flour door is much the biggest of the three, about SAR 2.2B across the four, and the one where nobody has taken anything from anyone. Every company's share sits within three points of its share of the Kingdom's milling capacity, and First Mills leads it because it has the largest mill. You hold the share your plant entitles you to, and there is no mechanism by which any of them could hold more.
Share of the flour door, FY2025 -
Where the competition is
Bran and feed
Bran tracks the mill closer still: the four sit within two points of their milling shares, on a door worth less than a fifth of the flour beside it. Bran is a physical consequence of milling to a specification, so the quantity arrives whether anyone wants it or not. Fourth Mills holds meaningfully more of this door than of the plant, by about two points, and that is the whole of the variation.
Share of the bran door, FY2025Feed is where the bars come apart from the plant, and it is the only one of the three doors sold at a price the company negotiates. Modern Mills holds a third of it, eight points more than its share of the Kingdom's milling capacity, and Fourth Mills an eighth, six points less than its plant implies. Share here is won rather than granted, which the other two doors could not show. Arabian Mills is the one to look at twice: about a quarter of the door on roughly a sixth of the cohort's feed capacity, so either it buys feedstock in or its disclosed capacity understates the line. It cuts both ways: this is the one stream a commodity market can move against them.
Share of the feed door, FY2025The only one of the three sold at a price the company negotiates.
-
Where the growth is
Beyond the allocation
Everything that is neither regulated flour nor the by-product sits here: durum and semolina, bakery lines, and flour exported under license since November 2024. It is the only door where a Saudi miller can both set its own price and add its own volume, and it is very nearly empty. First Mills runs the cohort's only durum line, and even there it is a rounding error against the wheat beside it. Arabian Mills reports none at all; the other two do not report the line. Whatever growth is not a bigger mill has to come from this door, and on today's disclosure barely anyone has opened it.
Durum capacity, FY2025Share of the company’s own wheat capacity. The only line here that is neither allocated nor priced by the authority.
Why utilization is the whole growth story
If the price is fixed and the allocation is granted, growth has to come from tons, and tons come from two places: more capacity, or more use of the capacity already standing.
All four now run their mills close to flat out, which is comfortable and awkward at once. Comfortable, because a plant near capacity spreads its fixed costs as thinly as they will go. Awkward, because the free growth is finished: from here more tons means more plant, and more plant means more invested capital measured against a margin that policy still sets. A miller adding capacity is not chasing a better price. It is buying the right to sell more units at the same one, and that only creates value while the granted margin holds.
Bars are the share of the company's own plant actually used, so the track is 100%.
A cash business, until recently
The third lever is working capital, and there is almost none of it. These companies are paid on delivery: receivables have run at a few days of sales for most of this period, and in several years at less than one. A telecom operator in the same market waits four months.
That is what selling to an approved list at an administered price does. The buyer is cleared by the authority, the price is not in dispute, and the product is a staple on a fixed schedule. What the cash cycle does contain is wheat: inventory, not receivables, is the whole of it.
The line has started to move, though, and in all four at once. A change that arrives across a whole industry is rarely one company's collections problem. It is more likely a change in who the customer is, and there is a dated candidate. Exports opened in November 2024, and small retail packs sit outside the price scheme altogether. Selling to a distributor or an overseas buyer means selling on terms. Selling to an approved bakery did not.
| 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Mills | 0 days | 1 days | 1 days | 1 days | 2 days | 3 days | 4 days | 9 days |
| Modern Mills | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 0 days | 0 days | 2 days | 7 days |
| Arabian Mills | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 1 days | 8 days | 15 days |
| Fourth Mills | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 1 days | 3 days | 4 days | 9 days |
Where the cash goes
Three uses, and each one consumes cash the other two could have had. One of the three turns out to be very nearly empty here, which is its own answer to what a milling company is for: there is almost nothing to buy, so the choice is only ever between the plant and the shareholder.
-
Back into the plant
Reinvest in capacity
Mills, silos and new lines: the only way to sell more tons at a price you do not set. Modern Mills is spending the most, having just rebuilt a plant a third larger than the year before. Arabian Mills spent heaviest of anyone early on and has been among the lightest since, which is the same decision from the other end. Fourth Mills is the lightest of the four, on the plant it runs hardest.
First MillsModern MillsArabian MillsFourth MillsChart data 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 First Mills 1.1% 7.6% 4.9% 4.8% 4.2% 12.4% 5.5% 7.4% Modern Mills 2.2% 3.0% 4.7% 3.3% 3.5% 6.0% 10.6% 13.3% Arabian Mills n/a n/a 7.7% 14.5% 8.1% 2.3% 1.9% 5.8% Fourth Mills n/a n/a 7.5% 6.2% 12.8% 1.8% 2.5% 5.4% -
Buy rather than build
Acquire companies
The emptiest chart on this page. In eight years First Mills is the only one of the four to have bought a company, once, in the final year. Modern Mills, Arabian Mills and Fourth Mills have spent nothing. These four were themselves the acquisitions, and the law needs the authority's approval before any of them buys another.
SAR millions, FY2018 to FY2025 -
Out to shareholders
Dividends
With nothing to buy, this is the only real competitor the plant has. First Mills pays the most per share and has paid every year since privatization, as has Modern Mills. Arabian Mills paid nothing until 2024, the other side of the acquisition debt it has been retiring fastest. Fourth Mills restructured its capital before listing, so its line is not one unit.
First MillsModern MillsArabian MillsFourth MillsChart data 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 First Mills 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.39 3.23 1.37 2.98 2.79 Modern Mills 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.88 1.73 2.00 2.00 Arabian Mills n/a n/a 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 1.00 Fourth Mills n/a n/a 0.00 0.00 1.29 4.19 0.26 0.22
The four millers
Same authority, same allocation, same administered price, and five stages of plant and brand that the sequence above has just measured them all against. The striking thing about that exercise is how little separates them. Their returns on capital differ by nearly ten points anyway, which is what the two sections after this one are about.
First Mills 2283
- Listed
- Jun 2023
- Market cap
- SAR 2.5B
- Revenue
- SAR 1.1B
- Net margin
- 24.2%
- Free cash flow
- SAR 260M
- Dividend / share
- SAR 2.79
Modern Mills 2284
- Listed
- Mar 2024
- Market cap
- SAR 2.3B
- Revenue
- SAR 1.0B
- Net margin
- 21.4%
- Free cash flow
- SAR 126M
- Dividend / share
- SAR 2.00
Arabian Mills 2285
- Listed
- Oct 2024
- Market cap
- SAR 2.0B
- Revenue
- SAR 998M
- Net margin
- 23.8%
- Free cash flow
- SAR 373M
- Dividend / share
- SAR 1.00
Fourth Mills 2286
- Listed
- Oct 2024
- Market cap
- SAR 1.9B
- Revenue
- SAR 660M
- Net margin
- 30.4%
- Free cash flow
- SAR 199M
- Dividend / share
- SAR 0.22
Figures for FY2025. Market cap is at the year-end close. Listed is the month each company began trading on the Main Market.
Side by side, FY2025
Everything above is the mechanism. This is the year just reported, on one page, with all 4 of them measured the same way.
| Measure | First Mills2283 | Modern Mills2284 | Arabian Mills2285 | Fourth Mills2286 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Highlights | ||||
| Net revenuesscale of the business | SAR 1,146M | SAR 1,047M | SAR 998M | SAR 660M |
| Revenue growthyear on year | +9.3% | +3.1% | +2.4% | +7.0% |
| EBITDA marginbefore capital charges | 35.1% | 30.6% | 39.1% | 40.4% |
| Net profit marginper riyal of sales | 24.2% | 21.4% | 23.8% | 30.4% |
| Cash Highlights | ||||
| Days sales outstandingdays to collect a sale | 9 days | 7 days | 15 days | 9 days |
| Capex % of revenuesas the cash flow statement reports it | 7.4% | 13.3% | 5.8% | 5.4% |
| Dividends per sharedeclared for the year | SAR 2.79 | SAR 2.00 | SAR 1.00 | SAR 0.22 |
| Free cash flowafter capital spending | SAR 260M | SAR 126M | SAR 373M | SAR 199M |
| Operational Highlights | ||||
| Factoriesproduction sites | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Millsmilling lines | 15 | 9 | 11 | 7 |
| Capacity utilizationof milling capacity in use | 94.0% | 92.0% | 90.0% | 98.3% |
| Wheat milling capacitytons a day | 5,150 | 4,700 | 4,920 | 3,518 |
| Other Highlights | ||||
| Board remunerationpaid to directors | SAR 4.8M | SAR 2.2M | SAR 3.9M | SAR 3.6M |
| Saudization rateof the workforce | 43.7% | 48.7% | 41.8% | 29.0% |
| Employeesheadcount at year end | 561 | 451 | 623 | 172 |
| Revenue per employeenet revenues per full-time employee | SAR 2.0M | SAR 2.3M | SAR 1.6M | SAR 3.8M |
Marking the stronger figure is arithmetic, not a recommendation. A company can lead every row here and still be the wrong price.
Does the capital earn its keep
Return on invested capital against what that capital costs, every year from FY2018 to FY2025. Above the line the business is creating value. Below it, it is consuming value, however healthy the revenue line looks.
First Mills+5.9pt FY2025
| 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC | 13.0% | 12.8% | 15.0% | 22.0% | 11.8% | 12.9% | 14.3% | 15.1% |
| WACC | 11.1% | 9.6% | 8.1% | 6.7% | 5.4% | 10.0% | 9.6% | 9.2% |
| Spread | +1.8pt | +3.1pt | +6.9pt | +15.3pt | +6.3pt | +3.0pt | +4.7pt | +5.9pt |
Modern Mills+13.6pt FY2025
| 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC | 5.9% | 3.6% | 6.0% | 10.0% | 27.3% | 25.0% | 23.1% | 23.2% |
| WACC | 6.8% | 5.2% | 5.1% | 3.0% | 4.3% | 6.1% | 9.9% | 9.5% |
| Spread | -0.9pt | -1.6pt | +1.0pt | +7.1pt | +23.0pt | +18.9pt | +13.2pt | +13.6pt |
Arabian Mills+4.6pt FY2025
| 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC | n/a | n/a | 10.8% | 9.5% | 11.2% | 14.3% | 14.2% | 14.3% |
| WACC | n/a | n/a | 6.6% | 6.2% | 2.7% | 8.8% | 8.5% | 9.7% |
| Spread | n/a | n/a | +4.2pt | +3.3pt | +8.5pt | +5.4pt | +5.7pt | +4.6pt |
Fourth Mills+9.5pt FY2025
| 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC | n/a | n/a | 8.4% | 8.2% | 16.6% | 15.1% | 17.9% | 18.1% |
| WACC | n/a | n/a | 6.6% | 6.1% | 6.8% | 6.4% | 8.3% | 8.7% |
| Spread | n/a | n/a | +1.8pt | +2.1pt | +9.8pt | +8.7pt | +9.6pt | +9.5pt |
What decides the next two years
Whether the wheat support survives its next review
The commitment to hold the price differential ran to 12 July 2025 and then lapsed, and the support has carried on unchanged since. Every spread over cost of capital in this sector sits on top of it. The millers are not wholly unprotected: the Ministry of Finance agreed to compensate them if the law, the implementing regulations, the pricing policy or the license period were changed, which is a real backstop against a rewrite. The gap in it is the case that matters most. On the terms disclosed at listing, a complete lifting of the subsidy after July 2025 is not a change the companies can claim against. That is the one version of this risk the state has not agreed to absorb.
Whether the purchase premiums are ever earned
Two of the four carry a large privatization premium in invested capital, and it does not shrink as debt is repaid. On the plants themselves all four earn comfortably more than their cost of capital; on the price their owners paid, two of them are still working. Watch for either an impairment, which resets the denominator in a single line, or enough profit growth to absorb it, which takes years.
Whether growth has anywhere left to come from
All four now run close to full capacity and the free growth is finished. The next ton has to be bought with capital, at a margin the state still sets. The first meaningful capacity additions since privatization have already begun, and the sector's returns over the next few years will largely be the arithmetic of what those additions cost against a margin that does not move.
Whether the unregulated half of the ton outgrows the regulated half
Bran, feed and durum sell at market prices, and the authority only opened flour exports to the licensed millers in November 2024, on condition that they export surplus capacity and refund the wheat subsidy on whatever leaves the country. That is the only part of this business where a management team can be better than its peers rather than the same as them. It is also the only part exposed to a commodity market, which cuts both ways.
The full workings
Every statement, ratio and cost-of-capital build behind this piece, for all 4 companies, on one page.
Open the data appendixThis is the rare sector where the cohort is the industry: all four milling companies licensed to process the Kingdom's subsidized wheat are listed, all four report to 31 December, and all four are covered here. A “sector median” on this site is therefore the median of the whole industry rather than of a sample. The histories are not equally long: the companies were carved out of the state grains organization and sold in 2020 and 2021, and the earliest years on each sheet are pre-privatization carve-out accounts, which is why several series begin part way across the period.